SurfaceMap › 4 › 4lima.de

4lima.de

Checked 2026-10-21 21:27 UTC · first added 2026-10-21
✗Problems found Score 59 of 100

Domain & DNS

warn

22 passed 2 warn 0 failed

Areas

iRegistration iDelegation !Nameservers ✓SOA !DNSSEC iRecords

Problems

  • !
    Software version disclosed
    Nameservers · These nameservers report their software version via version.bind/version.server, which helps attackers find known vulnerabilities: ns1.lima-city.de: "PowerDNS Authoritative Server 5.0.6 (built Jun 10 2026 12:59:10 by root@localhost)"; ns2.lima-city.de: "PowerDNS Authoritative Server 5.0.6 (built Jun 10 2026 12:59:10 by root@localhost)"; ns3.lima-city.de: "PowerDNS Authoritative Server 5.0.6 (built Jun 10 2026 12:59:10 by root@localhost)". Hide or replace the version string.
    #17
  • !
    Signed but not delegated securely
    DNSSEC · The zone is signed but the parent has no DS record, so the signatures are not used. Publish the DS record at your registrar.
    #27

Recent checks

!

Full report

Domain & DNS report for 4lima.de ›

Mail

fail

10 passed 5 warn 2 failed

Areas

✗SPF ✗DMARC !DKIM !DNSSEC !MX !TLS iBIMI

Problems

  • ✗
    No DMARC record
    DMARC · No DMARC record was found for this domain. DMARC is essential for preventing email spoofing. Add a DMARC record with p=reject or at least p=quarantine.
    #5
  • ✗
    No SPF record
    SPF · No SPF record was found for this domain. SPF is important for preventing email spoofing. Add an SPF record to specify which servers are authorized to send email for your domain.
    #6
  • !
    No key under common selectors
    DKIM · The _domainkey name exists but no DKIM key was found under the common selectors. Selectors are provider-specific; check yours with -selector.
    #7
  • !
    Signed, but no DS at parent
    DNSSEC · The zone is signed (DNSKEY present) but the parent has no DS record, so the chain of trust is incomplete. Publish the DS record at your registrar.
    #8
  • !
    Single MX host, no backup
    MX · Only one MX record found. For better email reliability, consider adding at least one backup MX server.
    #12
  • !
    Not configured
    TLS · MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • !
    Not configured
    TLS · MTA-STS or DANE is used without TLS-RPT, so you get no reports when senders fail to deliver because of TLS problems. Publish _smtp._tls TXT "v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:...".
    #35

Recent checks

✗

Full report

Mail report for 4lima.de ›