alternate.nl

Checked 21 October 2026, 20:45 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
!Passed with warnings
27 passed 5 warnings 0 failed 2 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 a:mail1.tle.de a:mail.tle.de a:mail2.tle.de ip4:94.23.165.105 ip4:91.121.25.96 ip4:217.102.252.158 ip4:212.115.198.48/29 ip6:2a02:f6c:76d:1:69::7 ip6:2a02:f6c:76d:1:69::9 ip6:2a02:f6c:76d:1:69::6 -all
DNS lookups
3 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 3 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 3 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with -all #3
    SPF record properly uses -all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

warn

p=quarantine (_dmarc.alternate.nl)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc-aggregate@alternate.nl; ruf=mailto:dmarc-afrf@alternate.nl; pct=100
Found at
_dmarc.alternate.nl
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pquarantinePolicy
pct100Percentage of mail the policy applies to
ruamailto:dmarc-aggregate@alternate.nlAggregate report addresses
rufmailto:dmarc-afrf@alternate.nlFailure report addresses

Checks

  • !
    Policy: quarantine
    DMARC policy is set to 'quarantine'. Consider upgrading to 'reject' for stronger protection once you've verified legitimate emails are passing authentication.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18
    DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:dmarc-aggregate@alternate.nl
  • ✓ Subdomain policy: quarantine #20
    Subdomains are covered by policy 'quarantine'.
  • ✓ Report addresses in own domain #29
    All report addresses are in your own organizational domain.

DKIM

warn

Selectors: dkim

Found

Selectors
dkim
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
dkimRSA 1024 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: dkim #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: dkim
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: dkim (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

pass

Signed, DS published at parent

Found

DNSKEY records
Yes (3)
DS at parent
Yes
Algorithms
RSASHA256 (8)
Key tags
13590, 32065, 31344
Signatures valid until
29 October 2026, 00:00 UTC

Checks

  • ✓ Signed, DS published at parent #8
    DNSSEC is enabled for this domain (DNSKEY and DS present), providing additional security for DNS lookups.
  • ✓ Signatures valid until 2026-10-29 #21
    DNSKEY signatures are valid until 2026-10-29T00:00:00Z.

MX

warn

3 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
10mx.spamexperts.comA 149.13.75.27 AAAA 2001:978:2:7::162:100fe1-r3-in.fra02.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe1-r3-in.fra02.l.antispamcloud.com ✓
20fallbackmx.spamexperts.euA 154.59.193.124 A 154.59.104.23 A 149.13.75.27 AAAA 2001:978:2:6::f:124 AAAA 2001:978:2:2c::137:100 AAAA 2001:978:2:7::162:100fe3-r3-in.du01.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe2-r3-in.ams14.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe1-r3-in.fra02.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe3-r3-in.du01.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe2-r3-in.ams14.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe1-r3-in.fra02.l.antispamcloud.com ✓
30lastmx.spamexperts.netA 38.89.254.156 A 38.71.16.244 A 149.13.75.27 A 154.59.104.23 AAAA 2001:550:2:3::62:100 AAAA 2001:978:2:7::162:100 AAAA 2001:978:2:2c::137:100 AAAA 2001:550:2:61::2fc:100fe1-r2-in.ch03.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe2-r2-in.la10.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe1-r3-in.fra02.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe2-r3-in.ams14.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe2-r2-in.la10.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe1-r3-in.fra02.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe2-r3-in.ams14.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ no PTR

Checks

  • ✓ 3 MX records #9
    Found 3 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • ✓ All hosts have IPv6 #11
    All MX records resolve to IPv6 addresses.
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 3 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 3 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • !
    Addresses without reverse DNS
    These MX addresses have no PTR record, which many receivers treat as a spam signal: 2001:550:2:61::2fc:100 (lastmx.spamexperts.net). Ask your hosting provider to set one.
    #30

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 3 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
mx.spamexperts.comnone-
fallbackmx.spamexperts.eunone-
lastmx.spamexperts.netnone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

warn

https://include.alternate.nl/logo_alternate.svg

Found

Record
v=BIMI1; l=https://include.alternate.nl/logo_alternate.svg
Found at
default._bimi.alternate.nl
Logo
https://include.alternate.nl/logo_alternate.svg

Checks

  • !
    No certificate (a=)
    The logo is published without a Verified Mark Certificate. Gmail and Apple Mail only show BIMI logos with a VMC or CMC; Yahoo shows it without one.
    #38
  • ✓ DMARC meets BIMI requirements #39
    DMARC is enforced on all mail, as BIMI requires.