bitdefender.fr

Checked 22 October 2026, 01:57 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
!Passed with warnings
24 passed 5 warnings 0 failed 3 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.bitdefender.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:_spf.atlassian.net include:spf.mindmatrix.net include:341979.spf06.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS lookups
9 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 9 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 9 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with -all #3
    SPF record properly uses -all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

warn

p=quarantine (_dmarc.bitdefender.fr)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-reports@bitdefender.com; pct=100; ruf=mailto:dmarc-forensics@bitdefender.com; fo=s; aspf=r; adkim=r;
Found at
_dmarc.bitdefender.fr
External report address
mailto:dmarc-reports@bitdefender.com (authorized)
External report address
mailto:dmarc-forensics@bitdefender.com (authorized)
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pquarantinePolicy
spnoneSubdomain policy
pct100Percentage of mail the policy applies to
ruamailto:dmarc-reports@bitdefender.comAggregate report addresses
rufmailto:dmarc-forensics@bitdefender.comFailure report addresses
adkimrDKIM alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)
aspfrSPF alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)
fosFailure reporting options

Checks

  • !
    Policy: quarantine
    DMARC policy is set to 'quarantine'. Consider upgrading to 'reject' for stronger protection once you've verified legitimate emails are passing authentication.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18
    DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:dmarc-reports@bitdefender.com
  • !
    Subdomains unprotected (sp=none)
    DMARC subdomain policy is sp=none, so spoofed mail from subdomains is not blocked. Consider sp=quarantine or sp=reject.
    #20
  • ✓ External report addresses authorized #29
    Report addresses in other domains have published their authorization.

DKIM

pass

Selectors: s1, s2

Found

Selectors
s1, s2
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
s1RSA 2048 bits
s2RSA 2048 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: s1, s2 #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: s1, s2
  • ✓ Strong keys #23
    DKIM keys are strong enough: s1: RSA 2048 bits; s2: RSA 2048 bits.
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records
No (0)
DS at parent
No

Checks

  • !
    Not enabled
    DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.
    #8

MX

warn

2 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
10mx01.bitdefender.comA 195.189.155.94mx01.bitdefender.com ✓
10mx02.bitdefender.comA 195.210.5.44mx02.bitdefender.com ✓

Checks

  • ✓ 2 MX records #9
    Found 2 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • !
    Hosts without IPv6
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: mx01.bitdefender.com, mx02.bitdefender.com
    #11
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 2 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 2 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 2 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 2 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
mx01.bitdefender.comnone-
mx02.bitdefender.comnone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

  • i
    Not configured
    BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.
    #38