d66.nl

Checked 21 October 2026, 21:00 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
✗Problems found
27 passed 4 warnings 1 failed 2 info

SPF

fail

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.exactonline.nl ip4:195.177.214.128/27 ip4:89.188.15.0/24 ip4:212.23.48.250/29 include:spf.cloudeu.oxcs.net include:_spf.exonet.nl include:sendgrid.net include:stripe.com -all
DNS lookups
16 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✗
    16 DNS lookups, over the limit of 10
    SPF record needs 16 DNS lookups (including nested includes), more than the limit of 10. Receivers will return a permerror; reduce includes or flatten the record.
    #2
  • ✓ Ends with -all #3
    SPF record properly uses -all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

pass

p=reject (_dmarc.d66.nl)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; aspf=r; adkim=r; pct=100; rua=mailto:62671b2406374cee965641212b5d1b4b@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net; fo=0; rf=afrf; ri=86400;
Found at
_dmarc.d66.nl
External report address
mailto:62671b2406374cee965641212b5d1b4b@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net (authorized)
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
prejectPolicy
sprejectSubdomain policy
pct100Percentage of mail the policy applies to
ruamailto:62671b2406374cee965641212b5d1b4b@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.netAggregate report addresses
adkimrDKIM alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)
aspfrSPF alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)
fo0Failure reporting options
rfafrfFailure report format
ri86400Report interval (seconds)

Checks

  • ✓ Policy: reject #4
    DMARC policy is set to 'reject', which provides the strongest protection against email spoofing.
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18
    DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:62671b2406374cee965641212b5d1b4b@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net
  • ✓ Subdomain policy: reject #20
    Subdomains are covered by policy 'reject'.
  • ✓ External report addresses authorized #29
    Report addresses in other domains have published their authorization.

DKIM

warn

Selectors: default, selector1, s1, s2

Found

Selectors
default, selector1, s1, s2
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
defaultRSA 1024 bits
selector1RSA 2048 bits
s1RSA 2048 bits
s2RSA 2048 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: default, selector1, s1, s2 #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: default, selector1, s1, s2
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: default (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

pass

Signed, DS published at parent

Found

DNSKEY records
Yes (2)
DS at parent
Yes
Algorithms
ECDSAP256SHA256 (13)
Key tags
34505, 2371
Signatures valid until
19 December 2026, 15:15 UTC

Checks

  • ✓ Signed, DS published at parent #8
    DNSSEC is enabled for this domain (DNSKEY and DS present), providing additional security for DNS lookups.
  • ✓ Signatures valid until 2026-12-19 #21
    DNSKEY signatures are valid until 2026-12-19T15:15:39Z.

MX

warn

1 mail server

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
0d66-nl.mail.protection.outlook.comA 52.101.68.12 A 52.101.68.27 A 52.101.209.31 A 52.101.91.159 AAAA 2a01:111:f403:c967::c AAAA 2a01:111:f403:ca09::20 AAAA 2a01:111:f403:ca21::c AAAA 2a01:111:f403:ca21::8mail-db9pr02cu00204.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-db7pr03cu00503.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-cpjpr05cu00207.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-matpr04cu00207.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-cpjpr05cu00204.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-as8pr05cu00400.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-matpr04cu00204.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-matpr04cu00100.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓

Checks

  • ✓ 1 MX record #9
    Found 1 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • ✓ All hosts have IPv6 #11
    All MX records resolve to IPv6 addresses.
  • !
    Single MX host, no backup
    Only one MX record found. For better email reliability, consider adding at least one backup MX server.
    #12
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 1 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 8 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 1 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
d66-nl.mail.protection.outlook.comnone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

warn

https://media.d66.nl/uploads/2026/04/d66_logo_square.svg

Found

Record
v=BIMI1; l=https://media.d66.nl/uploads/2026/04/d66_logo_square.svg;
Found at
default._bimi.d66.nl
Logo
https://media.d66.nl/uploads/2026/04/d66_logo_square.svg

Checks

  • !
    No certificate (a=)
    The logo is published without a Verified Mark Certificate. Gmail and Apple Mail only show BIMI logos with a VMC or CMC; Yahoo shows it without one.
    #38
  • ✓ DMARC meets BIMI requirements #39
    DMARC is enforced on all mail, as BIMI requires.