fna.fr

Checked 22 October 2026, 03:05 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
✗Problems found
22 passed 5 warnings 1 failed 3 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 mx include:spf.mtasv.net include:spf.mailjet.com include:sendgrid.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.mailinblack.com include:spf.sendinblue.com ~all
DNS lookups
8 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 8 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 8 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with ~all #3
    SPF record properly uses ~all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

fail

p=none (_dmarc.fna.fr)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400
Found at
_dmarc.fna.fr
External report address
mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m (authorized)
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pnonePolicy
spnoneSubdomain policy
pct100Percentage of mail the policy applies to
ruamailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10mAggregate report addresses
rufmailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10mFailure report addresses
rfafrfFailure report format
ri86400Report interval (seconds)

Checks

  • ✗
    Policy: none (monitoring only)
    DMARC policy is set to 'none', which only monitors but doesn't protect against spoofing. Consider upgrading to 'quarantine' or ideally 'reject'.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m
  • ✓ External report addresses authorized #29
    Report addresses in other domains have published their authorization.

DKIM

warn

Selectors: mail, selector1, s1, s2

Found

Selectors
mail, selector1, s1, s2
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
mailRSA 1024 bits
selector1RSA 1024 bits
s1RSA 2048 bits
s2RSA 2048 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: mail, selector1, s1, s2 #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: mail, selector1, s1, s2
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: mail (1024 bits), selector1 (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

pass

Signed, DS published at parent

Found

DNSKEY records
Yes (2)
DS at parent
Yes
Algorithms
RSASHA256 (8)
Key tags
40674, 57706
Signatures valid until
4 November 2026, 13:02 UTC

Checks

  • ✓ Signed, DS published at parent #8
    DNSSEC is enabled for this domain (DNSKEY and DS present), providing additional security for DNS lookups.
  • ✓ Signatures valid until 2026-11-04 #21
    DNSKEY signatures are valid until 2026-11-04T13:02:40Z.

MX

warn

1 mail server

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
30synomega.mailinblack.comA 52.143.171.137no PTR

Checks

  • ✓ 1 MX record #9
    Found 1 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • !
    Hosts without IPv6
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: synomega.mailinblack.com
    #11
  • !
    Single MX host, no backup
    Only one MX record found. For better email reliability, consider adding at least one backup MX server.
    #12
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 1 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • !
    Addresses without reverse DNS
    These MX addresses have no PTR record, which many receivers treat as a spam signal: 52.143.171.137 (synomega.mailinblack.com). Ask your hosting provider to set one.
    #30

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 1 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
synomega.mailinblack.comnone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

  • i
    Not configured
    BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.
    #38