Mail domain report: hoshinoresorts.com

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record: v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com a:ms212.kagoya.net include:aspmx.pardot.com include:spf-bma.mpme.jp +ip4:13.112.198.189 +ip4:54.64.73.95 +ip4:202.218.193.41 +ip4:3.115.151.224 +ip4:54.64.44.75 ~all
DNS lookups: 5 of 10
Void lookups: 0 of 2

Checks

✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1

No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
✓ 5 of 10 DNS lookups #2

SPF record needs 5 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
✓ Ends with ~all #3

SPF record properly uses ~all to restrict unauthorized senders.
✓ Record published #6

SPF record exists for this domain.
✓ Single record #16

Exactly one SPF record is published.
✓ Valid syntax #25

All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
✓ No void lookups #26

All include/redirect targets exist.
✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27

All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

pass

p=reject (_dmarc.hoshinoresorts.com)

Found

Record: v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:jp-git-dmark_report@ac.hoshinoresorts.com
Found at: _dmarc.hoshinoresorts.com

Tag	Value	Meaning
v	DMARC1	Version
p	reject	Policy
rua	mailto:jp-git-dmark_report@ac.hoshinoresorts.com	Aggregate report addresses

Checks

✓ Policy: reject #4

DMARC policy is set to 'reject', which provides the strongest protection against email spoofing.
✓ Record published #5

DMARC record exists for this domain.
✓ Valid syntax #17

DMARC record syntax is valid.
✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18

DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19

Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:jp-git-dmark_report@ac.hoshinoresorts.com
✓ Subdomain policy: reject #20

Subdomains are covered by policy 'reject'.
✓ Report addresses in own domain #29

All report addresses are in your own organizational domain.

DKIM

warn

Selectors: google, s1, s2

Found

Selectors: google, s1, s2
_domainkey: NOERROR

Selector	Key	Flags
google	RSA 2048 bits
s1	RSA 2048 bits
s2	RSA 1024 bits

Checks

✓ Keys found: google, s1, s2 #7

DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: google, s1, s2
!

1024-bit DKIM key

1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: s2 (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.

#23
✓ No problematic flags #24

No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records: No (0)
DS at parent: No

Checks

!

Not enabled

DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.

#8

MX

warn

2 mail servers

Found

Priority	Host	Records	Reverse DNS
10	mxa-009f5901.gslb.pphosted.com	A 205.220.161.206	mx0a-009f5901.pphosted.com ✓
10	mxb-009f5901.gslb.pphosted.com	A 205.220.173.206	mx0b-009f5901.pphosted.com ✓

Checks

✓ 2 MX records #9

Found 2 MX records for this domain.
✓ All hosts resolve #10

All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
!

Hosts without IPv6

The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: mxa-009f5901.gslb.pphosted.com, mxb-009f5901.gslb.pphosted.com

#11
✓ Redundant MX hosts #12

Found 2 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
✓ At most 5 MX records #13

Found 2 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
✓ No localhost targets #14

No MX records pointing to localhost found.
✓ No private IP addresses #15

No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
✓ No CNAME targets #22

No MX records point to a CNAME.
✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30

All 2 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 2 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX host	TLSA	DNSSEC
mxa-009f5901.gslb.pphosted.com	none	-
mxb-009f5901.gslb.pphosted.com	none	-

Checks

!

Not configured

MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.

#32
i

Not configured

TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.

#35
i

Not used

No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.

#36

BIMI

warn

https://www.hoshinoresorts.com/m/member/img/hoshinoresorts_logo_maru_icon.svg

Found

Record: v=BIMI1; l=https://www.hoshinoresorts.com/m/member/img/hoshinoresorts_logo_maru_icon.svg;
Found at: default._bimi.hoshinoresorts.com
Logo: https://www.hoshinoresorts.com/m/member/img/hoshinoresorts_logo_maru_icon.svg

Checks

!

No certificate (a=)

The logo is published without a Verified Mark Certificate. Gmail and Apple Mail only show BIMI logos with a VMC or CMC; Yahoo shows it without one.

#38
✓ DMARC meets BIMI requirements #39

DMARC is enforced on all mail, as BIMI requires.