Mail domain report: iubenda.com

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record: v=spf1 a ip4:23.253.182.122 ip4:159.112.245.91 include:144191059.spf08.hubspotemail.net include:_spf.freshsales.io include:spf.spamfilter.io include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-eu.emailsignatures365.com ~all
DNS lookups: 8 of 10
Void lookups: 0 of 2

Checks

✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1

No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
✓ 8 of 10 DNS lookups #2

SPF record needs 8 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
✓ Ends with ~all #3

SPF record properly uses ~all to restrict unauthorized senders.
✓ Record published #6

SPF record exists for this domain.
✓ Single record #16

Exactly one SPF record is published.
✓ Valid syntax #25

All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
✓ No void lookups #26

All include/redirect targets exist.
✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27

All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

warn

p=reject (_dmarc.iubenda.com)

Found

Record: v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:re+hinwrmqwwbe@dmarc.postmarkapp.com; sp=none; aspf=r;
Found at: _dmarc.iubenda.com
External report address: mailto:re+hinwrmqwwbe@dmarc.postmarkapp.com (authorized)

Tag	Value	Meaning
v	DMARC1	Version
p	reject	Policy
sp	none	Subdomain policy
pct	100	Percentage of mail the policy applies to
rua	mailto:re+hinwrmqwwbe@dmarc.postmarkapp.com	Aggregate report addresses
aspf	r	SPF alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)

Checks

✓ Policy: reject #4

DMARC policy is set to 'reject', which provides the strongest protection against email spoofing.
✓ Record published #5

DMARC record exists for this domain.
✓ Valid syntax #17

DMARC record syntax is valid.
✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18

DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19

Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:re+hinwrmqwwbe@dmarc.postmarkapp.com
!

Subdomains unprotected (sp=none)

DMARC subdomain policy is sp=none, so spoofed mail from subdomains is not blocked. Consider sp=quarantine or sp=reject.

#20
✓ External report addresses authorized #29

Report addresses in other domains have published their authorization.

DKIM

warn

Selectors: default, selector1, google, mx, pm

Found

Selectors: default, selector1, google, mx, pm
_domainkey: NOERROR

Selector	Key	Flags
default	RSA 1024 bits
selector1	RSA 2048 bits
google	RSA 1024 bits
mx	RSA 1024 bits
pm	RSA 1024 bits

Checks

✓ Keys found: default, selector1, google, mx, pm #7

DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: default, selector1, google, mx, pm
!

1024-bit DKIM key

1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: default (1024 bits), google (1024 bits), mx (1024 bits), pm (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.

#23
✓ No problematic flags #24

No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records: No (0)
DS at parent: No

Checks

!

Not enabled

DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.

#8

MX

warn

1 mail server

Found

Priority	Host	Records	Reverse DNS
1	mx.spamfilter.io	A 89.188.78.64 A 46.36.212.38 A 46.36.212.36 A 46.36.212.37 A 89.188.78.65 A 89.188.78.66 A 46.36.212.34 A 94.231.106.12	node3.spamfilter.io ✓ node7.spamfilter.io ✓ node8.spamfilter.io ✓ node6.spamfilter.io ✓ node9.spamfilter.io ✓ node10.spamfilter.io ✓ node4.spamfilter.io ✓ node2.spamfilter.io ✓

Checks

✓ 1 MX record #9

Found 1 MX records for this domain.
✓ All hosts resolve #10

All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
!

Hosts without IPv6

The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: mx.spamfilter.io

#11
!

Single MX host, no backup

Only one MX record found. For better email reliability, consider adding at least one backup MX server.

#12
✓ At most 5 MX records #13

Found 1 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
✓ No localhost targets #14

No MX records pointing to localhost found.
✓ No private IP addresses #15

No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
✓ No CNAME targets #22

No MX records point to a CNAME.
✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30

All 8 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 1 of 1 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX host	TLSA	DNSSEC
mx.spamfilter.io	3 1 1 9a25f05f2e322dab…	Yes

Checks

!

Not configured

MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.

#32
!

Not configured

MTA-STS or DANE is used without TLS-RPT, so you get no reports when senders fail to deliver because of TLS problems. Publish _smtp._tls TXT "v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:...".

#35
✓ DANE on all MX hosts #36

All 1 MX host publish DNSSEC-validated TLSA records.

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

i

Not configured

BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.

#38