koeln.de

Checked 21 October 2026, 23:10 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
✗Problems found
18 passed 6 warnings 2 failed 2 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 include:_spf1.snafu.de include:_spf2.snafu.de include:netcologne.de ~all
DNS lookups
4 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 4 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 4 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with ~all #3
    SPF record properly uses ~all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

fail

p=none (_dmarc.koeln.de)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;
Found at
_dmarc.koeln.de
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pnonePolicy
spnoneSubdomain policy

Checks

  • ✗
    Policy: none (monitoring only)
    DMARC policy is set to 'none', which only monitors but doesn't protect against spoofing. Consider upgrading to 'quarantine' or ideally 'reject'.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • !
    No aggregate reports (rua)
    DMARC record has no rua tag, so you receive no aggregate reports about who sends mail as your domain. Add rua=mailto:...
    #19

DKIM

warn

No keys found under the checked selectors

Found

Selectors
None found
_domainkey
NOERROR

Checks

  • !
    No key under common selectors
    The _domainkey name exists but no DKIM key was found under the common selectors. Selectors are provider-specific; check yours with -selector.
    #7

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records
No (0)
DS at parent
No

Checks

  • !
    Not enabled
    DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.
    #8

MX

warn

2 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
10mailin.koeln.deA 84.23.254.54mailin.koeln.de ✓
50secondary.snafu.deA 84.23.254.17no PTR

Checks

  • ✓ 2 MX records #9
    Found 2 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • !
    Hosts without IPv6
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: mailin.koeln.de, secondary.snafu.de
    #11
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 2 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 2 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • !
    Addresses without reverse DNS
    These MX addresses have no PTR record, which many receivers treat as a spam signal: 84.23.254.17 (secondary.snafu.de). Ask your hosting provider to set one.
    #30

TLS

fail

MTA-STS record without policy · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 2 MX hosts

Found

MTA-STS record
v=STSv1; id=2026100501
Policy URL
https://mta-sts.koeln.de/.well-known/mta-sts.txt
Policy error
https://mta-sts.koeln.de/.well-known/mta-sts.txt returned HTTP 503

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
mailin.koeln.denone-
secondary.snafu.denone-

Checks

  • ✓ Record published #32
    MTA-STS record found with id 2026100501.
  • ✗
    Policy not reachable
    The MTA-STS record exists but the policy could not be fetched, so senders ignore MTA-STS: https://mta-sts.koeln.de/.well-known/mta-sts.txt returned HTTP 503.
    #33
  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS or DANE is used without TLS-RPT, so you get no reports when senders fail to deliver because of TLS problems. Publish _smtp._tls TXT "v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:...".
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

  • i
    Not configured
    BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.
    #38