lampenwelt.de

Checked 21 October 2026, 23:11 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
!Passed with warnings
27 passed 5 warnings 0 failed 2 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 a a:spf.mas.t-systems-service.com ip4:93.188.245.176 ip4:93.188.245.186 include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.exclaimer.net include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.zimpel.de ~all
DNS lookups
9 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 9 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 9 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with ~all #3
    SPF record properly uses ~all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

warn

p=quarantine (_dmarc.lampenwelt.de)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; pct=100
Found at
_dmarc.lampenwelt.de
External report address
mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email (authorized)
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pquarantinePolicy
pct100Percentage of mail the policy applies to
ruamailto:dmarc_agg@vali.emailAggregate report addresses

Checks

  • !
    Policy: quarantine
    DMARC policy is set to 'quarantine'. Consider upgrading to 'reject' for stronger protection once you've verified legitimate emails are passing authentication.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18
    DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email
  • ✓ Subdomain policy: quarantine #20
    Subdomains are covered by policy 'quarantine'.
  • ✓ External report addresses authorized #29
    Report addresses in other domains have published their authorization.

DKIM

warn

Selectors: selector2, s1, s2

Found

Selectors
selector2, s1, s2
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
selector2RSA 1024 bits
s1RSA 2048 bits
s2RSA 1024 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: selector2, s1, s2 #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: selector2, s1, s2
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: selector2 (1024 bits), s2 (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

warn

Signed, but no DS at parent

Found

DNSKEY records
Yes (2)
DS at parent
No
Algorithms
RSASHA256 (8)
Key tags
61475, 33759
Signatures valid until
10 November 2026, 20:02 UTC

Checks

  • !
    Signed, but no DS at parent
    The zone is signed (DNSKEY present) but the parent has no DS record, so the chain of trust is incomplete. Publish the DS record at your registrar.
    #8
  • ✓ Signatures valid until 2026-11-10 #21
    DNSKEY signatures are valid until 2026-11-10T20:02:48Z.

MX

warn

1 mail server

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
10lampenwelt-de.mail.protection.outlook.comA 52.101.68.8 A 52.101.91.153 A 52.101.68.27 A 52.101.185.114 AAAA 2a01:111:f403:ca04::10 AAAA 2a01:111:f403:c967::8 AAAA 2a01:111:f403:ca09::26 AAAA 2a01:111:f403:ca3c::amail-du0pr03cu00100.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-matpr04cu00101.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-db7pr03cu00503.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-zrxpr04cu00102.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-dbapr03cu00100.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-cpjpr04cu00100.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-am8pr83cu00106.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-zrxpr07cu00102.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓

Checks

  • ✓ 1 MX record #9
    Found 1 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • ✓ All hosts have IPv6 #11
    All MX records resolve to IPv6 addresses.
  • !
    Single MX host, no backup
    Only one MX record found. For better email reliability, consider adding at least one backup MX server.
    #12
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 1 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 8 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 1 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
lampenwelt-de.mail.protection.outlook.comnone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

pass

https://sa01prdbimi.blob.core.windows.net/bimi/lampenwelt_gmbh_294194326.svg

Found

Record
v=BIMI1;l=https://sa01prdbimi.blob.core.windows.net/bimi/lampenwelt_gmbh_294194326.svg;a=https://sa01prdbimi.blob.core.windows.net/bimi/lampenwelt_gmbh_294194326.pem
Found at
default._bimi.lampenwelt.de
Logo
https://sa01prdbimi.blob.core.windows.net/bimi/lampenwelt_gmbh_294194326.svg
Certificate
https://sa01prdbimi.blob.core.windows.net/bimi/lampenwelt_gmbh_294194326.pem

Checks

  • ✓ Logo and certificate published #38
    BIMI logo: https://sa01prdbimi.blob.core.windows.net/bimi/lampenwelt_gmbh_294194326.svg; certificate: https://sa01prdbimi.blob.core.windows.net/bimi/lampenwelt_gmbh_294194326.pem
  • ✓ DMARC meets BIMI requirements #39
    DMARC is enforced on all mail, as BIMI requires.