laptopmag.com

Checked 22 October 2026, 09:34 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
!Passed with warnings
17 passed 4 warnings 0 failed 1 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 -all
DNS lookups
0 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 0 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 0 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with -all #3
    SPF record properly uses -all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

warn

p=reject (_dmarc.laptopmag.com)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:re+bjabuluezjz@dmarc.postmarkapp.com; sp=none; aspf=r;
Found at
_dmarc.laptopmag.com
External report address
mailto:re+bjabuluezjz@dmarc.postmarkapp.com (authorized)
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
prejectPolicy
spnoneSubdomain policy
pct100Percentage of mail the policy applies to
ruamailto:re+bjabuluezjz@dmarc.postmarkapp.comAggregate report addresses
aspfrSPF alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)

Checks

  • ✓ Policy: reject #4
    DMARC policy is set to 'reject', which provides the strongest protection against email spoofing.
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18
    DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:re+bjabuluezjz@dmarc.postmarkapp.com
  • !
    Subdomains unprotected (sp=none)
    DMARC subdomain policy is sp=none, so spoofed mail from subdomains is not blocked. Consider sp=quarantine or sp=reject.
    #20
  • ✓ External report addresses authorized #29
    Report addresses in other domains have published their authorization.

DKIM

warn

Selectors: selector1, selector2

Found

Selectors
selector1, selector2
_domainkey
NXDOMAIN
SelectorKeyFlags
selector1RSA 1024 bits
selector2RSA 1024 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: selector1, selector2 #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: selector1, selector2
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: selector1 (1024 bits), selector2 (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records
No (0)
DS at parent
No

Checks

  • !
    Not enabled
    DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.
    #8

MX

warn

No MX records found

Checks

  • !
    No MX records
    No MX records found. If this domain is used for email, add MX records to specify mail servers. If it never receives mail, publish a null MX ("MX 0 .").
    #9
  • ✓ Locked down against spoofing #28
    The domain has no MX records and publishes SPF "v=spf1 -all" and DMARC p=reject, so nobody can send mail as this domain.

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

  • i
    Not configured
    BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.
    #38