latestedebuch.fr

Checked 22 October 2026, 03:45 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
✗Problems found
21 passed 4 warnings 1 failed 3 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 mx a include:spf.cloud.vadesecure.com include:spf.hornetsecurity.com include:_spf.afi-sa.net include:_spf.datapressepremium.com include:spf.mailjet.com include:refpac.agom.net ip4:54.229.96.27 ip4:217.160.0.222 ip4:80.14.17.222 ip4:193.253.193.181 ip4:77.135.218.230 ip4:77.135.218.232 ip4:77.135.218.229 ip4:217.74.103.251 ip4:213.32.80.28 ip4:141.94.202.165 ip4:213.32.80.203 ip4:217.74.103.211 ip4:194.164.201.142 ip4:188.165.43.157 ip4:87.98.220.14 ~all
DNS lookups
8 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 8 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 8 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with ~all #3
    SPF record properly uses ~all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

fail

p=none (_dmarc.latestedebuch.fr)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=none
Found at
_dmarc.latestedebuch.fr
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pnonePolicy

Checks

  • ✗
    Policy: none (monitoring only)
    DMARC policy is set to 'none', which only monitors but doesn't protect against spoofing. Consider upgrading to 'quarantine' or ideally 'reject'.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • !
    No aggregate reports (rua)
    DMARC record has no rua tag, so you receive no aggregate reports about who sends mail as your domain. Add rua=mailto:...
    #19

DKIM

pass

Selectors: s1, s2

Found

Selectors
s1, s2
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
s1RSA 2048 bits
s2RSA 2048 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: s1, s2 #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: s1, s2
  • ✓ Strong keys #23
    DKIM keys are strong enough: s1: RSA 2048 bits; s2: RSA 2048 bits.
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records
No (0)
DS at parent
No

Checks

  • !
    Not enabled
    DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.
    #8

MX

warn

4 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
10vade-mx-fr01.hornetsecurity.comA 94.100.138.100hsmx01-hz12.hornetsecurity.com ✓
10vade-mx-fr02.hornetsecurity.comA 94.100.138.100hsmx01-hz12.hornetsecurity.com ✓
20vade-mx-eu-fallback01.hornetsecurity.comA 94.100.132.8mx01.hornetsecurity.com ✓
20vade-mx-eu-fallback02.hornetsecurity.comA 94.100.132.8mx01.hornetsecurity.com ✓

Checks

  • ✓ 4 MX records #9
    Found 4 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • !
    Hosts without IPv6
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: vade-mx-fr01.hornetsecurity.com, vade-mx-fr02.hornetsecurity.com, vade-mx-eu-fallback01.hornetsecurity.com, vade-mx-eu-fallback02.hornetsecurity.com
    #11
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 4 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 4 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 4 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 4 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
vade-mx-fr01.hornetsecurity.comnone-
vade-mx-fr02.hornetsecurity.comnone-
vade-mx-eu-fallback01.hornetsecurity.comnone-
vade-mx-eu-fallback02.hornetsecurity.comnone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

  • i
    Not configured
    BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.
    #38