libcal.com

Checked 22 October 2026, 09:35 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
✗Problems found
12 passed 5 warnings 2 failed 3 info

SPF

fail

No SPF record found

Checks

  • ✗
    No SPF record
    No SPF record was found for this domain. SPF is important for preventing email spoofing. Add an SPF record to specify which servers are authorized to send email for your domain.
    #6

DMARC

fail

p=none (_dmarc.libcal.com)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;adkim=r;aspf=r;rua=mailto:postman@dmarc.springyaws.com
Found at
_dmarc.libcal.com
External report address
mailto:postman@dmarc.springyaws.com (authorized)
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pnonePolicy
pct100Percentage of mail the policy applies to
ruamailto:postman@dmarc.springyaws.comAggregate report addresses
adkimrDKIM alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)
aspfrSPF alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)

Checks

  • ✗
    Policy: none (monitoring only)
    DMARC policy is set to 'none', which only monitors but doesn't protect against spoofing. Consider upgrading to 'quarantine' or ideally 'reject'.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:postman@dmarc.springyaws.com
  • ✓ External report addresses authorized #29
    Report addresses in other domains have published their authorization.

DKIM

warn

No keys found under the checked selectors

Found

Selectors
None found
_domainkey
NOERROR

Checks

  • !
    No key under common selectors
    The _domainkey name exists but no DKIM key was found under the common selectors. Selectors are provider-specific; check yours with -selector.
    #7

DNSSEC

warn

Signed, DS published at parent

Found

DNSKEY records
Yes (3)
DS at parent
Yes
Algorithms
ECDSAP256SHA256 (13)
Key tags
35123, 1335, 13065
Signatures valid until
22 October 2026, 18:00 UTC

Checks

  • ✓ Signed, DS published at parent #8
    DNSSEC is enabled for this domain (DNSKEY and DS present), providing additional security for DNS lookups.
  • !
    Signatures expire in 8h0m0s
    DNSKEY signatures expire at 2026-10-22T18:00:00Z (in 8h0m0s). Check that re-signing works.
    #21

MX

warn

1 mail server

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
10mx.hover.com.cust.hostedemail.comA 216.40.42.4mx.hostedemail.com ✓

Checks

  • ✓ 1 MX record #9
    Found 1 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • !
    Hosts without IPv6
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: mx.hover.com.cust.hostedemail.com
    #11
  • !
    Single MX host, no backup
    Only one MX record found. For better email reliability, consider adding at least one backup MX server.
    #12
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 1 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 1 MX address have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 1 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
mx.hover.com.cust.hostedemail.comnone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

  • i
    Not configured
    BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.
    #38