SurfaceMap › l › luminex.be

luminex.be

Checked 2026-10-22 06:50 UTC · first added 2026-10-21
✗Problems found Score 72 of 100

Domain & DNS

warn

28 passed 1 warn 0 failed

Areas

iRegistration ✓Delegation iNameservers ✓SOA !DNSSEC iRecords

Problems

  • !
    NSEC3 with extra iterations or salt
    DNSSEC · NSEC3 uses 5 iterations and a 4-byte salt. RFC 9276 recommends 0 iterations and no salt: extra iterations cost resolvers CPU and add no real protection, and some validators treat high counts as insecure.
    #31

Recent checks

!

Full report

Domain & DNS report for luminex.be ›

Mail

fail

25 passed 5 warn 1 failed

Areas

✗SPF !DMARC !DKIM ✓DNSSEC !MX !TLS !BIMI

Problems

  • ✗
    12 DNS lookups, over the limit of 10
    SPF · SPF record needs 12 DNS lookups (including nested includes), more than the limit of 10. Receivers will return a permerror; reduce includes or flatten the record.
    #2
  • !
    Single MX host, no backup
    MX · Only one MX record found. For better email reliability, consider adding at least one backup MX server.
    #12
  • !
    No aggregate reports (rua)
    DMARC · DMARC record has no rua tag, so you receive no aggregate reports about who sends mail as your domain. Add rua=mailto:...
    #19
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    DKIM · 1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: k1 (1024 bits), selector2 (1024 bits), zoho (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • !
    Not configured
    TLS · MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • !
    No certificate (a=)
    BIMI · The logo is published without a Verified Mark Certificate. Gmail and Apple Mail only show BIMI logos with a VMC or CMC; Yahoo shows it without one.
    #38

Recent checks

✗

Full report

Mail report for luminex.be ›