myprovence.fr

Checked 22 October 2026, 04:30 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
✗Problems found
18 passed 7 warnings 1 failed 3 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 ip4:195.200.185.0/26 ip4:185.47.28.70 ip4:185.29.150.212 ip4:31.170.11.50 ip4:31.170.8.205 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:emsd1.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.dahub.io -all
DNS lookups
5 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 5 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 5 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with -all #3
    SPF record properly uses -all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

fail

p=none (_dmarc.myprovence.fr)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=none;
Found at
_dmarc.myprovence.fr
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pnonePolicy

Checks

  • ✗
    Policy: none (monitoring only)
    DMARC policy is set to 'none', which only monitors but doesn't protect against spoofing. Consider upgrading to 'quarantine' or ideally 'reject'.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • !
    No aggregate reports (rua)
    DMARC record has no rua tag, so you receive no aggregate reports about who sends mail as your domain. Add rua=mailto:...
    #19

DKIM

warn

Selectors: selector1, selector2, s1, s2

Found

Selectors
selector1, selector2, s1, s2
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
selector1RSA 2048 bits
selector2RSA 2048 bits
s1RSA 2048 bits
s2RSA 1024 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: selector1, selector2, s1, s2 #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: selector1, selector2, s1, s2
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: s2 (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records
No (0)
DS at parent
No

Checks

  • !
    Not enabled
    DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.
    #8

MX

warn

2 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
5mx10.mailinblack.comA 51.103.112.132no PTR
100mx10b.mailinblack.com(does not resolve)

Checks

  • ✓ 2 MX records #9
    Found 2 MX records for this domain.
  • !
    Hosts without IP addresses
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IP addresses: mx10b.mailinblack.com
    #10
  • !
    Hosts without IPv6
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: mx10.mailinblack.com, mx10b.mailinblack.com
    #11
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 2 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 2 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • !
    Addresses without reverse DNS
    These MX addresses have no PTR record, which many receivers treat as a spam signal: 51.103.112.132 (mx10.mailinblack.com). Ask your hosting provider to set one.
    #30

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 2 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
mx10.mailinblack.comnone-
mx10b.mailinblack.comnone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

  • i
    Not configured
    BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.
    #38