nmz.de

Checked 21 October 2026, 23:40 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
✗Problems found
23 passed 4 warnings 1 failed 1 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 a:mail.conbrio.de ip4:78.46.128.86 ip4:194.97.132.16 ip4:194.97.132.15 ip6:2001:608:2:84::130 ip6:2001:608:2:84::135 ~all
DNS lookups
1 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 1 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 1 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with ~all #3
    SPF record properly uses ~all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

fail

p=none (_dmarc.nmz.de)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=none;
Found at
_dmarc.nmz.de
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pnonePolicy

Checks

  • ✗
    Policy: none (monitoring only)
    DMARC policy is set to 'none', which only monitors but doesn't protect against spoofing. Consider upgrading to 'quarantine' or ideally 'reject'.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • !
    No aggregate reports (rua)
    DMARC record has no rua tag, so you receive no aggregate reports about who sends mail as your domain. Add rua=mailto:...
    #19

DKIM

pass

Selectors: default

Found

Selectors
default
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
defaultRSA 2048 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: default #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: default
  • ✓ Strong keys #23
    DKIM keys are strong enough: default: RSA 2048 bits.
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records
No (0)
DS at parent
No

Checks

  • !
    Not enabled
    DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.
    #8

MX

pass

2 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
10gatekeeper.space.netA 194.97.132.2 A 195.30.114.130 A 194.97.132.16 AAAA 2001:608:2:84::130 AAAA 2001:608:3:84::2 AAAA 2001:608:3:84::16gatekeeper1.space.net ✓ gatekeeper2.space.net ✓ gatekeeper3.space.net ✓ gatekeeper2.space.net ✓ gatekeeper1.space.net ✓ gatekeeper3.space.net ✓
10gatekeeper.spacenet.deA 195.30.114.135 A 194.97.132.15 A 194.97.132.6 AAAA 2001:608:3:84::15 AAAA 2001:608:2:84::135 AAAA 2001:608:3:84::6gatekeeper2.spacenet.de ✓ gatekeeper3.spacenet.de ✓ gatekeeper1.spacenet.de ✓ gatekeeper3.spacenet.de ✓ gatekeeper2.spacenet.de ✓ gatekeeper1.spacenet.de ✓

Checks

  • ✓ 2 MX records #9
    Found 2 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • ✓ All hosts have IPv6 #11
    All MX records resolve to IPv6 addresses.
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 2 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 2 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 12 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 2 of 2 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
gatekeeper.space.net3 1 1 2da870224ea7666d…Yes
gatekeeper.spacenet.de3 1 1 c68d7e7d8b26e6f6…Yes

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS or DANE is used without TLS-RPT, so you get no reports when senders fail to deliver because of TLS problems. Publish _smtp._tls TXT "v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:...".
    #35
  • ✓ DANE on all MX hosts #36
    All 2 MX hosts publish DNSSEC-validated TLSA records.

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

  • i
    Not configured
    BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.
    #38