oogvereniging.nl

Checked 22 October 2026, 15:01 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
✗Problems found
24 passed 4 warnings 1 failed 1 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 include:spf.monshouwer.eu include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.e-captain.nl include:spf.afas.online include:spf.mailcamp.nl ip4:185.94.230.81 ip4:81.204.100.47 ip6:2a00:f10:13f:0:1c00:39ff:fe00:13e ~all
DNS lookups
6 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 6 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 6 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with ~all #3
    SPF record properly uses ~all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

fail

p=none (_dmarc.oogvereniging.nl)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=none;
Found at
_dmarc.oogvereniging.nl
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pnonePolicy

Checks

  • ✗
    Policy: none (monitoring only)
    DMARC policy is set to 'none', which only monitors but doesn't protect against spoofing. Consider upgrading to 'quarantine' or ideally 'reject'.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • !
    No aggregate reports (rua)
    DMARC record has no rua tag, so you receive no aggregate reports about who sends mail as your domain. Add rua=mailto:...
    #19

DKIM

warn

Selectors: selector1, selector2, s1, s2

Found

Selectors
selector1, selector2, s1, s2
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
selector1RSA 2048 bits
selector2RSA 2048 bits
s1RSA 2048 bits
s2RSA 1024 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: selector1, selector2, s1, s2 #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: selector1, selector2, s1, s2
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: s2 (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

pass

Signed, DS published at parent

Found

DNSKEY records
Yes (1)
DS at parent
Yes
Algorithms
ECDSAP256SHA256 (13)
Key tags
18037
Signatures valid until
5 November 2026, 00:00 UTC

Checks

  • ✓ Signed, DS published at parent #8
    DNSSEC is enabled for this domain (DNSKEY and DS present), providing additional security for DNS lookups.
  • ✓ Signatures valid until 2026-11-05 #21
    DNSKEY signatures are valid until 2026-11-05T00:00:00Z.

MX

pass

4 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
10filter10.antispamcloud.comA 149.13.75.27 AAAA 2001:978:2:7::162:100fe1-r3-in.fra02.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe1-r3-in.fra02.l.antispamcloud.com ✓
20filter20.antispamcloud.comA 149.13.75.27 AAAA 2001:978:2:7::162:100fe1-r3-in.fra02.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe1-r3-in.fra02.l.antispamcloud.com ✓
30filter30.antispamcloud.comA 154.59.104.23 AAAA 2001:978:2:2c::137:100fe2-r3-in.ams14.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe2-r3-in.ams14.l.antispamcloud.com ✓
40filter40.antispamcloud.comA 154.59.193.124 AAAA 2001:978:2:6::f:124fe3-r3-in.du01.l.antispamcloud.com ✓ fe3-r3-in.du01.l.antispamcloud.com ✓

Checks

  • ✓ 4 MX records #9
    Found 4 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • ✓ All hosts have IPv6 #11
    All MX records resolve to IPv6 addresses.
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 4 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 4 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 8 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 4 of 4 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
filter10.antispamcloud.com3 1 1 a10ec56f992e0e0c…Yes
filter20.antispamcloud.com3 1 1 a10ec56f992e0e0c…Yes
filter30.antispamcloud.com3 1 1 a10ec56f992e0e0c…Yes
filter40.antispamcloud.com3 1 1 a10ec56f992e0e0c…Yes

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS or DANE is used without TLS-RPT, so you get no reports when senders fail to deliver because of TLS problems. Publish _smtp._tls TXT "v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:...".
    #35
  • ✓ DANE on all MX hosts #36
    All 4 MX hosts publish DNSSEC-validated TLSA records.

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

  • i
    Not configured
    BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.
    #38