opodo.fr

Checked 22 October 2026, 04:39 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
✗Problems found
17 passed 5 warnings 1 failed 3 info

SPF

warn

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 include:spf-a.odigeo.com include:spf-b.odigeo.com include:u1941612.wl.sendgrid.net ip4:82.150.225.79 ip4:206.17.168.27 ip4:62.23.35.22 mx ?include:trustpilotservice.com ~all
DNS lookups
5 of 10
Void lookups
1 of 2
Problem
include:spf-b.odigeo.com does not exist or has no records

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • !
    5 of 10 DNS lookups, with problems
    SPF record needs 5 DNS lookups (limit is 10). Problems found: include:spf-b.odigeo.com does not exist or has no records.
    #2
  • ✓ Ends with ~all #3
    SPF record properly uses ~all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • !
    1 void lookup
    1 include/redirect target does not exist or has no records (limit is 2). This usually is a stale include; remove it.
    #26
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

fail

No DMARC record found

Checks

  • ✗
    No DMARC record
    No DMARC record was found for this domain. DMARC is essential for preventing email spoofing. Add a DMARC record with p=reject or at least p=quarantine.
    #5

DKIM

warn

Selectors: s1, s2

Found

Selectors
s1, s2
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
s1RSA 2048 bits
s2RSA 1024 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: s1, s2 #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: s1, s2
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: s2 (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records
No (0)
DS at parent
No

Checks

  • !
    Not enabled
    DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.
    #8

MX

pass

2 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
5alt1.aspmx.l.google.comA 142.250.147.26 AAAA 2a00:1450:4025:c01::1brd-in-f26.1e100.net ✓ rd-in-f27.1e100.net ✓
5alt2.aspmx.l.google.comA 172.253.152.26 AAAA 2a00:1450:4010:c22::1byulpptr-in-f26.1e100.net ✓ yulpptr-in-f27.1e100.net ✓

Checks

  • ✓ 2 MX records #9
    Found 2 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • ✓ All hosts have IPv6 #11
    All MX records resolve to IPv6 addresses.
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 2 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 2 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 4 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 2 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
alt1.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt2.aspmx.l.google.comnone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

  • i
    Not configured
    BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.
    #38