pc-helpforum.be

Checked 22 October 2026, 07:01 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
✗Problems found
19 passed 6 warnings 1 failed 3 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 a mx ip4:92.63.164.50 include:pool.vxfilter.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS lookups
4 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 4 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 4 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with -all #3
    SPF record properly uses -all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

fail

p=none (_dmarc.pc-helpforum.be)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:zakelijk@pc-helpforum.be;
Found at
_dmarc.pc-helpforum.be
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pnonePolicy
ruamailto:zakelijk@pc-helpforum.beAggregate report addresses

Checks

  • ✗
    Policy: none (monitoring only)
    DMARC policy is set to 'none', which only monitors but doesn't protect against spoofing. Consider upgrading to 'quarantine' or ideally 'reject'.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:zakelijk@pc-helpforum.be
  • ✓ Report addresses in own domain #29
    All report addresses are in your own organizational domain.

DKIM

warn

No keys found under the checked selectors

Found

Selectors
None found
_domainkey
NOERROR

Checks

  • !
    No key under common selectors
    The _domainkey name exists but no DKIM key was found under the common selectors. Selectors are provider-specific; check yours with -selector.
    #7

DNSSEC

warn

Signed, DS published at parent

Found

DNSKEY records
Yes (2)
DS at parent
Yes
Algorithms
ECDSAP256SHA256 (13)
Key tags
57947, 8771
Signatures valid until
29 October 2026, 00:00 UTC

Checks

  • ✓ Signed, DS published at parent #8
    DNSSEC is enabled for this domain (DNSKEY and DS present), providing additional security for DNS lookups.
  • !
    Signatures expire in 161h0m0s
    DNSKEY signatures expire at 2026-10-29T00:00:00Z (in 161h0m0s). Check that re-signing works.
    #21

MX

warn

2 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
0pchelpforum-be0e.mail.protection.outlook.comAAAA 2a01:111:f403:ca04::4 AAAA 2a01:111:f403:ca21::a AAAA 2a01:111:f403:ca3c::6 AAAA 2a01:111:f403:ca38::8mail-db4pr02cu00204.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-maspr04cu00102.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-zrxpr04cu00106.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓ mail-wa4pr04cu00100.inbound.protection.outlook.com ✓
10mail.pc-helpforum.beCNAME pc-helpforum.be A 92.63.164.50no PTR

Checks

  • ✓ 2 MX records #9
    Found 2 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • !
    Hosts without IPv6
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: mail.pc-helpforum.be
    #11
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 2 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 2 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • !
    Hosts are CNAMEs
    MX records must point to a host name with A/AAAA records, not to a CNAME: mail.pc-helpforum.be -> pc-helpforum.be
    #22
  • !
    Addresses without reverse DNS
    These MX addresses have no PTR record, which many receivers treat as a spam signal: 92.63.164.50 (mail.pc-helpforum.be). Ask your hosting provider to set one.
    #30

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 2 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
pchelpforum-be0e.mail.protection.outlook.comnone-
mail.pc-helpforum.benone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

  • i
    Not configured
    BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.
    #38