Mail domain report: pro-medienmagazin.de

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record: v=spf1 a:mg01.tbits.net a:mailgate02.tbits.net a:mailgate03.tbits.net a:mailgate04.tbits.net a:mailgate05.tbits.net a:mailgate01.tbits.net +mx include:spf.mailjet.com ~all
DNS lookups: 8 of 10
Void lookups: 0 of 2

Checks

✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1

No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
✓ 8 of 10 DNS lookups #2

SPF record needs 8 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
✓ Ends with ~all #3

SPF record properly uses ~all to restrict unauthorized senders.
✓ Record published #6

SPF record exists for this domain.
✓ Single record #16

Exactly one SPF record is published.
✓ Valid syntax #25

All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
✓ No void lookups #26

All include/redirect targets exist.
✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27

All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

fail

p=none (_dmarc.pro-medienmagazin.de)

Found

Record: v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=s; adkim=s;
Found at: _dmarc.pro-medienmagazin.de

Tag	Value	Meaning
v	DMARC1	Version
p	none	Policy
adkim	s	DKIM alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)
aspf	s	SPF alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)

Checks

✗

Policy: none (monitoring only)

DMARC policy is set to 'none', which only monitors but doesn't protect against spoofing. Consider upgrading to 'quarantine' or ideally 'reject'.

#4
✓ Record published #5

DMARC record exists for this domain.
✓ Valid syntax #17

DMARC record syntax is valid.
!

No aggregate reports (rua)

DMARC record has no rua tag, so you receive no aggregate reports about who sends mail as your domain. Add rua=mailto:...

#19

DKIM

warn

No keys found under the checked selectors

Found

Selectors: None found
_domainkey: NOERROR

Checks

!

No key under common selectors

The _domainkey name exists but no DKIM key was found under the common selectors. Selectors are provider-specific; check yours with -selector.

#7

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records: No (0)
DS at parent: No

Checks

!

Not enabled

DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.

#8

MX

warn

1 mail server

Found

Priority	Host	Records	Reverse DNS
10	mg01.kep.de	A 178.250.226.118 AAAA 2a00:b260:0:2139::b001:1	mg01.kep.de ✓ mg01.tbits.net (does not resolve back)

Checks

✓ 1 MX record #9

Found 1 MX records for this domain.
✓ All hosts resolve #10

All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
✓ All hosts have IPv6 #11

All MX records resolve to IPv6 addresses.
!

Single MX host, no backup

Only one MX record found. For better email reliability, consider adding at least one backup MX server.

#12
✓ At most 5 MX records #13

Found 1 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
✓ No localhost targets #14

No MX records pointing to localhost found.
✓ No private IP addresses #15

No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
✓ No CNAME targets #22

No MX records point to a CNAME.
!

Reverse DNS does not match

The PTR name of these addresses does not resolve back to the same address: 2a00:b260:0:2139::b001:1 -> mg01.tbits.net.

#30

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 1 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX host	TLSA	DNSSEC
mg01.kep.de	none	-

Checks

!

Not configured

MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.

#32
i

Not configured

TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.

#35
i

Not used

No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.

#36

BIMI

info

No BIMI record

Checks

i

Not configured

BIMI shows your logo next to your mail in supporting mail clients. It requires DMARC enforcement.

#38