rebrandly.com

Checked 22 October 2026, 10:25 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
!Passed with warnings
31 passed 4 warnings 0 failed 1 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mail.intercom.io include:mail.zendesk.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:4412251.spf08.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS lookups
7 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 7 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 7 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with -all #3
    SPF record properly uses -all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

warn

p=quarantine (_dmarc.rebrandly.com)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; pct=100; rua=mailto:1c11786b@mxtoolbox.dmarc-report.com; ruf=mailto:1c11786b@forensics.dmarc-report.com
Found at
_dmarc.rebrandly.com
External report address
mailto:1c11786b@mxtoolbox.dmarc-report.com (authorized)
External report address
mailto:1c11786b@forensics.dmarc-report.com (authorized)
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pquarantinePolicy
pct100Percentage of mail the policy applies to
ruamailto:1c11786b@mxtoolbox.dmarc-report.comAggregate report addresses
rufmailto:1c11786b@forensics.dmarc-report.comFailure report addresses
fo1Failure reporting options

Checks

  • !
    Policy: quarantine
    DMARC policy is set to 'quarantine'. Consider upgrading to 'reject' for stronger protection once you've verified legitimate emails are passing authentication.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18
    DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:1c11786b@mxtoolbox.dmarc-report.com
  • ✓ Subdomain policy: quarantine #20
    Subdomains are covered by policy 'quarantine'.
  • ✓ External report addresses authorized #29
    Report addresses in other domains have published their authorization.

DKIM

warn

Selectors: google

Found

Selectors
google
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
googleRSA 1024 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: google #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: google
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: google (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

warn

Signed, DS published at parent

Found

DNSKEY records
Yes (3)
DS at parent
Yes
Algorithms
ECDSAP256SHA256 (13)
Key tags
4082, 21069, 15921
Signatures valid until
22 October 2026, 18:00 UTC

Checks

  • ✓ Signed, DS published at parent #8
    DNSSEC is enabled for this domain (DNSKEY and DS present), providing additional security for DNS lookups.
  • !
    Signatures expire in 8h0m0s
    DNSKEY signatures expire at 2026-10-22T18:00:00Z (in 8h0m0s). Check that re-signing works.
    #21

MX

pass

5 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
1aspmx.l.google.comA 142.251.127.27 AAAA 2a00:1450:4001:c21::1blcfrai-in-f27.1e100.net ✓ lcfrai-in-f27.1e100.net ✓
5alt1.aspmx.l.google.comA 142.250.147.26 AAAA 2a00:1450:4025:c01::1brd-in-f26.1e100.net ✓ rd-in-f27.1e100.net ✓
5alt2.aspmx.l.google.comA 172.253.152.26 AAAA 2a00:1450:4010:c22::1ayulpptr-in-f26.1e100.net ✓ yulpptr-in-f26.1e100.net ✓
10alt3.aspmx.l.google.comA 192.179.20.26 AAAA 2404:6800:4000:1027::1bncboms-in-f26.1e100.net ✓ ncboms-in-f27.1e100.net ✓
10alt4.aspmx.l.google.comA 192.178.158.27 AAAA 2404:6800:4013:813::1alcdels-in-f27.1e100.net ✓ lcdels-in-f26.1e100.net ✓

Checks

  • ✓ 5 MX records #9
    Found 5 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • ✓ All hosts have IPv6 #11
    All MX records resolve to IPv6 addresses.
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 5 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 5 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 10 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

info

MTA-STS enforce · TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 5 MX hosts

Found

MTA-STS record
v=STSv1; id=20260505T175018
Policy URL
https://mta-sts.rebrandly.com/.well-known/mta-sts.txt
Mode
enforce
Allowed MX
aspmx.l.google.com, *.aspmx.l.google.com
Max age
604800 seconds
TLS-RPT record
v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:security@rebrandly.com

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt1.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt2.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt3.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt4.aspmx.l.google.comnone-

Checks

  • ✓ Record published #32
    MTA-STS record found with id 20260505T175018.
  • ✓ Policy enforced #33
    The MTA-STS policy is enforced and cached for 168h0m0s.
  • ✓ All MX hosts covered #34
    Every MX host matches an mx: line of the MTA-STS policy.
  • ✓ Reports enabled #35
    TLS reports are sent to: mailto:security@rebrandly.com
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

warn

https://custom.rebrandly.com/bimi/com.rebrandly/icon.svg

Found

Record
v=BIMI1; l=https://custom.rebrandly.com/bimi/com.rebrandly/icon.svg
Found at
default._bimi.rebrandly.com
Logo
https://custom.rebrandly.com/bimi/com.rebrandly/icon.svg

Checks

  • !
    No certificate (a=)
    The logo is published without a Verified Mark Certificate. Gmail and Apple Mail only show BIMI logos with a VMC or CMC; Yahoo shows it without one.
    #38
  • ✓ DMARC meets BIMI requirements #39
    DMARC is enforced on all mail, as BIMI requires.