saoneetloire71.fr

Checked 22 October 2026, 05:08 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
!Passed with warnings
26 passed 5 warnings 0 failed 2 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 include:spf.ingenie.fr include:spf4.sbr-master.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-cd71.mgdis.fr include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.express-mail.com ip4:23.90.117.27 ip4:23.90.116.70 ip4:213.182.43.194 ip4:213.182.43.195 ip4:90.121.62.151 ip4:90.121.62.152 ip4:87.252.12.86 ip4:87.252.12.54 ip4:87.252.5.10 ip4:87.252.5.11 ip4:62.4.23.170 ip4:168.245.119.218 ip4:93.188.174.146 ip4:185.182.168.82 ip4:213.182.43.192/28 exists:%{i}.spf.hc1359-86.eu.iphmx.com -all
DNS lookups
8 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 8 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 8 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with -all #3
    SPF record properly uses -all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

warn

p=quarantine (_dmarc.saoneetloire71.fr)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:bzn7c3au@ag.eu.dmarcian.com,mailto:rua@saoneetloire71.fr; ruf=mailto:bzn7c3au@fr.eu.dmarcian.com,mailto:ruf@saoneetloire71.fr; rf=afrf; ri=86400; fo=1;
Found at
_dmarc.saoneetloire71.fr
External report address
mailto:bzn7c3au@ag.eu.dmarcian.com (authorized)
External report address
mailto:bzn7c3au@fr.eu.dmarcian.com (authorized)
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pquarantinePolicy
spquarantineSubdomain policy
pct100Percentage of mail the policy applies to
ruamailto:bzn7c3au@ag.eu.dmarcian.com,mailto:rua@saoneetloire71.frAggregate report addresses
rufmailto:bzn7c3au@fr.eu.dmarcian.com,mailto:ruf@saoneetloire71.frFailure report addresses
adkimrDKIM alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)
aspfrSPF alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)
fo1Failure reporting options
rfafrfFailure report format
ri86400Report interval (seconds)

Checks

  • !
    Policy: quarantine
    DMARC policy is set to 'quarantine'. Consider upgrading to 'reject' for stronger protection once you've verified legitimate emails are passing authentication.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18
    DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:bzn7c3au@ag.eu.dmarcian.com, mailto:rua@saoneetloire71.fr
  • ✓ Subdomain policy: quarantine #20
    Subdomains are covered by policy 'quarantine'.
  • ✓ External report addresses authorized #29
    Report addresses in other domains have published their authorization.

DKIM

warn

Selectors: default, dkim, mail, email, k1, selector1, google, zoho, mx, key, mta, pm, dkim-smtp, s1, s2

Found

Selectors
default, dkim, mail, email, k1, selector1, google, zoho, mx, key, mta, pm, dkim-smtp, s1, s2
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
defaultrevoked
dkimrevoked
mailRSA 1024 bits
emailrevoked
k1revoked
selector1RSA 1024 bits
googlerevoked
zohorevoked
mxrevoked
keyrevoked
mtarevoked
pmrevoked
dkim-smtprevoked
s1revoked
s2revoked

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: default, dkim, mail, email, k1, selector1, google, zoho, mx, key, mta, pm, dkim-smtp, s1, s2 #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: default, dkim, mail, email, k1, selector1, google, zoho, mx, key, mta, pm, dkim-smtp, s1, s2
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: mail (1024 bits), selector1 (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No test mode or SHA-1-only keys. Revoked keys (empty p=), which is fine after a key rotation: default, dkim, email, k1, google, zoho, mx, key, mta, pm, dkim-smtp, s1, s2.

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records
No (0)
DS at parent
No

Checks

  • !
    Not enabled
    DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.
    #8

MX

warn

2 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
10mx1.hc1359-86.eu.iphmx.comA 23.90.111.143 A 23.90.110.216esa.hc1359-86.eu.iphmx.com ✓ esa.hc1359-86.eu.iphmx.com ✓
10mx2.hc1359-86.eu.iphmx.comA 23.90.111.143 A 23.90.110.216esa.hc1359-86.eu.iphmx.com ✓ esa.hc1359-86.eu.iphmx.com ✓

Checks

  • ✓ 2 MX records #9
    Found 2 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • !
    Hosts without IPv6
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: mx1.hc1359-86.eu.iphmx.com, mx2.hc1359-86.eu.iphmx.com
    #11
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 2 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 2 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 4 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 2 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
mx1.hc1359-86.eu.iphmx.comnone-
mx2.hc1359-86.eu.iphmx.comnone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

pass

https://saone-et-loire71.fr/bimi/Departement71_tiny_ps.svg

Found

Record
v=BIMI1; l=https://saone-et-loire71.fr/bimi/Departement71_tiny_ps.svg; a=https://saone-et-loire71.fr/bimi/Departement71.pem
Found at
default._bimi.saoneetloire71.fr
Logo
https://saone-et-loire71.fr/bimi/Departement71_tiny_ps.svg
Certificate
https://saone-et-loire71.fr/bimi/Departement71.pem

Checks

  • ✓ Logo and certificate published #38
    BIMI logo: https://saone-et-loire71.fr/bimi/Departement71_tiny_ps.svg; certificate: https://saone-et-loire71.fr/bimi/Departement71.pem
  • ✓ DMARC meets BIMI requirements #39
    DMARC is enforced on all mail, as BIMI requires.