sonatype.com

Checked 22 October 2026, 10:45 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
✗Problems found
23 passed 7 warnings 1 failed 2 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 mx ip4:209.167.231.0/24 ip4:66.48.80.0/25 ip4:204.92.21.0/25 ip4:192.174.90.242 include:_spf.google.com include:u1891087.wl.sendgrid.net include:em6694.sonatype.com include:em200.sonatype.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:1958393.spf10.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS lookups
7 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 7 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 7 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with -all #3
    SPF record properly uses -all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

warn

p=quarantine (_dmarc.sonatype.com)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; ruf=mailto:dmarc+ruf@sonatype.com; fo=1; aspf=r; rua=mailto:ohyscx0p@ag.us.dmarcian.com;
Found at
_dmarc.sonatype.com
External report address
mailto:ohyscx0p@ag.us.dmarcian.com (authorized)
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
pquarantinePolicy
pct100Percentage of mail the policy applies to
ruamailto:ohyscx0p@ag.us.dmarcian.comAggregate report addresses
rufmailto:dmarc+ruf@sonatype.comFailure report addresses
aspfrSPF alignment (r = relaxed, s = strict)
fo1Failure reporting options

Checks

  • !
    Policy: quarantine
    DMARC policy is set to 'quarantine'. Consider upgrading to 'reject' for stronger protection once you've verified legitimate emails are passing authentication.
    #4
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18
    DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:ohyscx0p@ag.us.dmarcian.com
  • ✓ Subdomain policy: quarantine #20
    Subdomains are covered by policy 'quarantine'.
  • ✓ External report addresses authorized #29
    Report addresses in other domains have published their authorization.

DKIM

warn

Selectors: google, s1, s2

Found

Selectors
google, s1, s2
_domainkey
NXDOMAIN
SelectorKeyFlags
googleRSA 1024 bits
s1RSA 2048 bits
s2RSA 1024 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: google, s1, s2 #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: google, s1, s2
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: google (1024 bits), s2 (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

warn

Not signed

Found

DNSKEY records
No (0)
DS at parent
No

Checks

  • !
    Not enabled
    DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.
    #8

MX

warn

7 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
1aspmx.l.google.comA 142.251.127.27 AAAA 2a00:1450:4001:c21::1blcfrai-in-f27.1e100.net ✓ lcfrai-in-f27.1e100.net ✓
5alt1.aspmx.l.google.comA 142.250.147.27 AAAA 2a00:1450:4025:c01::1brd-in-f27.1e100.net ✓ rd-in-f27.1e100.net ✓
5alt2.aspmx.l.google.comA 172.253.152.26 AAAA 2a00:1450:4010:c22::1ayulpptr-in-f26.1e100.net ✓ yulpptr-in-f26.1e100.net ✓
10alt3.aspmx.l.google.comA 192.179.20.26 AAAA 2404:6800:4000:1027::1bncboms-in-f26.1e100.net ✓ ncboms-in-f27.1e100.net ✓
10alt4.aspmx.l.google.comA 192.178.158.27 AAAA 2404:6800:4013:813::1alcdels-in-f27.1e100.net ✓ lcdels-in-f26.1e100.net ✓
32767ms10280012.msv1.invalid(does not resolve)
32767ms24241164.msv1.invalid(does not resolve)

Checks

  • ✓ 7 MX records #9
    Found 7 MX records for this domain.
  • !
    Hosts without IP addresses
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IP addresses: ms10280012.msv1.invalid, ms24241164.msv1.invalid
    #10
  • !
    Hosts without IPv6
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: ms10280012.msv1.invalid, ms24241164.msv1.invalid
    #11
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 7 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • !
    More than 5 MX records
    Found 7 MX records, which is more than the recommended maximum of 5. Too many MX records may indicate a misconfiguration.
    #13
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 10 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

no MTA-STS · no TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 7 MX hosts

Found

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt1.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt2.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt3.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt4.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
ms10280012.msv1.invalidnone-
ms24241164.msv1.invalidnone-

Checks

  • !
    Not configured
    MTA-STS is not configured, so other mail servers fall back to unencrypted delivery when TLS fails or is stripped by an attacker. Publish a _mta-sts TXT record and a policy at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
    #32
  • i
    Not configured
    TLS-RPT lets senders report TLS delivery problems to you. It is most useful together with MTA-STS or DANE.
    #35
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

fail

https://www.sonatype.com/hubfs/1-2025_Website-Assets/logos/logo.png

Found

Record
v=BIMI1; l=https://www.sonatype.com/hubfs/1-2025_Website-Assets/logos/logo.png; a=URL of VMC;
Found at
default._bimi.sonatype.com
Logo
https://www.sonatype.com/hubfs/1-2025_Website-Assets/logos/logo.png
Certificate
URL of VMC

Checks

  • ✗
    Invalid BIMI record
    Mail clients ignore the BIMI record because of: certificate URL "URL of VMC" must use https://.
    #38
  • ✓ DMARC meets BIMI requirements #39
    DMARC is enforced on all mail, as BIMI requires.