sparktoro.com

Checked 22 October 2026, 10:46 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
!Passed with warnings
27 passed 7 warnings 0 failed 1 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS lookups
2 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 2 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 2 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with -all #3
    SPF record properly uses -all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

warn

p=reject (_dmarc.sparktoro.com)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=reject;
Found at
_dmarc.sparktoro.com
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
prejectPolicy

Checks

  • ✓ Policy: reject #4
    DMARC policy is set to 'reject', which provides the strongest protection against email spoofing.
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18
    DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
  • !
    No aggregate reports (rua)
    DMARC record has no rua tag, so you receive no aggregate reports about who sends mail as your domain. Add rua=mailto:...
    #19
  • ✓ Subdomain policy: reject #20
    Subdomains are covered by policy 'reject'.

DKIM

warn

Selectors: k1, google

Found

Selectors
k1, google
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
k1RSA 1024 bits
googleRSA 2048 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: k1, google #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: k1, google
  • !
    1024-bit DKIM key
    1024-bit RSA keys are the minimum and are considered weak today: k1 (1024 bits). Rotate to a 2048-bit key.
    #23
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

pass

Signed, DS published at parent

Found

DNSKEY records
Yes (2)
DS at parent
Yes
Algorithms
ECDSAP256SHA256 (13)
Key tags
2371, 34505
Signatures valid until
6 December 2026, 16:40 UTC

Checks

  • ✓ Signed, DS published at parent #8
    DNSSEC is enabled for this domain (DNSKEY and DS present), providing additional security for DNS lookups.
  • ✓ Signatures valid until 2026-12-06 #21
    DNSKEY signatures are valid until 2026-12-06T16:40:59Z.

MX

warn

6 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
1aspmx.l.google.comA 142.251.127.27 AAAA 2a00:1450:4001:c21::1alcfrai-in-f27.1e100.net ✓ lcfrai-in-f26.1e100.net ✓
5alt1.aspmx.l.google.comA 142.250.147.27 AAAA 2a00:1450:4025:c01::1brd-in-f27.1e100.net ✓ rd-in-f27.1e100.net ✓
5alt2.aspmx.l.google.comA 172.253.152.26 AAAA 2a00:1450:4010:c22::1ayulpptr-in-f26.1e100.net ✓ yulpptr-in-f26.1e100.net ✓
10alt3.aspmx.l.google.comA 192.179.20.26 AAAA 2404:6800:4000:1027::1bncboms-in-f26.1e100.net ✓ ncboms-in-f27.1e100.net ✓
10alt4.aspmx.l.google.comA 192.178.158.26 AAAA 2404:6800:4013:813::1alcdels-in-f26.1e100.net ✓ lcdels-in-f26.1e100.net ✓
15qz6mbhn7onypmvtu7bcoikvtavlsdff7vraowv2gkicbf6vlyarq.mx-verification.google.com(does not resolve)

Checks

  • ✓ 6 MX records #9
    Found 6 MX records for this domain.
  • !
    Hosts without IP addresses
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IP addresses: qz6mbhn7onypmvtu7bcoikvtavlsdff7vraowv2gkicbf6vlyarq.mx-verification.google.com
    #10
  • !
    Hosts without IPv6
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: qz6mbhn7onypmvtu7bcoikvtavlsdff7vraowv2gkicbf6vlyarq.mx-verification.google.com
    #11
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 6 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • !
    More than 5 MX records
    Found 6 MX records, which is more than the recommended maximum of 5. Too many MX records may indicate a misconfiguration.
    #13
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 10 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

MTA-STS testing · TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 6 MX hosts

Found

MTA-STS record
v=STSv1; id=20250915
Policy URL
https://mta-sts.sparktoro.com/.well-known/mta-sts.txt
Mode
testing
Allowed MX
aspmx.l.google.com, alt3.aspmx.l.google.com, alt4.aspmx.l.google.com, qz6mbhn7onypmvtu7bcoikvtavlsdff7vraowv2gkicbf6vlyarq.mx-verification.google.com, alt1.aspmx.l.google.com, alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
Max age
604800 seconds
TLS-RPT record
v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:smtp-tls-reports@sparktoro.com

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt1.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt2.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt3.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
alt4.aspmx.l.google.comnone-
qz6mbhn7onypmvtu7bcoikvtavlsdff7vraowv2gkicbf6vlyarq.mx-verification.google.comnone-

Checks

  • ✓ Record published #32
    MTA-STS record found with id 20250915.
  • !
    Policy in testing mode
    With mode: testing, senders only report TLS problems (via TLS-RPT) and still deliver without TLS. Switch to mode: enforce once reports are clean.
    #33
  • ✓ All MX hosts covered #34
    Every MX host matches an mx: line of the MTA-STS policy.
  • ✓ Reports enabled #35
    TLS reports are sent to: mailto:smtp-tls-reports@sparktoro.com
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

warn

https://sparktoro.com/img/social-s-bimi.svg

Found

Record
v=BIMI1; l=https://sparktoro.com/img/social-s-bimi.svg
Found at
default._bimi.sparktoro.com
Logo
https://sparktoro.com/img/social-s-bimi.svg

Checks

  • !
    No certificate (a=)
    The logo is published without a Verified Mark Certificate. Gmail and Apple Mail only show BIMI logos with a VMC or CMC; Yahoo shows it without one.
    #38
  • ✓ DMARC meets BIMI requirements #39
    DMARC is enforced on all mail, as BIMI requires.