webhoster.de

Checked 22 October 2026, 01:00 UTC · via 8.8.8.8
!Passed with warnings
32 passed 3 warnings 0 failed 1 info

SPF

pass

SPF record published

Found

Record
v=spf1 include:_u.webhoster.de._spf.dmarclf.com -all
DNS lookups
6 of 10
Void lookups
0 of 2

Checks

  • ✓ No deprecated ptr mechanism #1
    No ptr mechanism found in SPF record.
  • ✓ 6 of 10 DNS lookups #2
    SPF record needs 6 DNS lookups (limit is 10).
  • ✓ Ends with -all #3
    SPF record properly uses -all to restrict unauthorized senders.
  • ✓ Record published #6
    SPF record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Single record #16
    Exactly one SPF record is published.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #25
    All SPF mechanisms and modifiers are valid.
  • ✓ No void lookups #26
    All include/redirect targets exist.
  • ✓ No overly broad IP ranges #27
    All ip4/ip6 ranges are narrow enough.

DMARC

pass

p=reject (_dmarc.webhoster.de)

Found

Record
v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:64fc5c48d0569@ag.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:64fc5c48d0569@fo.dmarcly.com; sp=reject;
Found at
_dmarc.webhoster.de
External report address
mailto:64fc5c48d0569@ag.dmarcly.com (authorized)
External report address
mailto:64fc5c48d0569@fo.dmarcly.com (authorized)
TagValueMeaning
vDMARC1Version
prejectPolicy
sprejectSubdomain policy
pct100Percentage of mail the policy applies to
ruamailto:64fc5c48d0569@ag.dmarcly.comAggregate report addresses
rufmailto:64fc5c48d0569@fo.dmarcly.comFailure report addresses

Checks

  • ✓ Policy: reject #4
    DMARC policy is set to 'reject', which provides the strongest protection against email spoofing.
  • ✓ Record published #5
    DMARC record exists for this domain.
  • ✓ Valid syntax #17
    DMARC record syntax is valid.
  • ✓ Applies to 100% of mail #18
    DMARC policy applies to all failing mail.
  • ✓ Aggregate reports enabled #19
    Aggregate reports are sent to: mailto:64fc5c48d0569@ag.dmarcly.com
  • ✓ Subdomain policy: reject #20
    Subdomains are covered by policy 'reject'.
  • ✓ External report addresses authorized #29
    Report addresses in other domains have published their authorization.

DKIM

pass

Selectors: default, mail

Found

Selectors
default, mail
_domainkey
NOERROR
SelectorKeyFlags
defaultRSA 2048 bits
mailRSA 2048 bits

Checks

  • ✓ Keys found: default, mail #7
    DKIM keys found for this domain with selectors: default, mail
  • ✓ Strong keys #23
    DKIM keys are strong enough: default: RSA 2048 bits; mail: RSA 2048 bits.
  • ✓ No problematic flags #24
    No keys in test mode, revoked, or limited to SHA-1.

DNSSEC

pass

Signed, DS published at parent

Found

DNSKEY records
Yes (2)
DS at parent
Yes
Algorithms
ECDSAP256SHA256 (13)
Key tags
2371, 34505
Signatures valid until
5 December 2026, 11:59 UTC

Checks

  • ✓ Signed, DS published at parent #8
    DNSSEC is enabled for this domain (DNSKEY and DS present), providing additional security for DNS lookups.
  • ✓ Signatures valid until 2026-12-05 #21
    DNSKEY signatures are valid until 2026-12-05T11:59:44Z.

MX

warn

4 mail servers

Found

PriorityHostRecordsReverse DNS
10spamschutz.webhoster.deA 212.172.221.190spamschutz.webhoster.de ✓
20mx2.webhoster.netA 185.159.120.90 A 185.159.122.190 A 62.26.185.190 A 62.27.118.190spamschutz3.webhoster.de ✓ spamschutz4.webhoster.de ✓ spamschutz2b.webhoster.de ✓ spamschutzb.webhoster.de ✓
30mx3.webhoster.orgA 62.26.185.190 A 185.159.122.190 A 62.27.118.190 A 185.159.120.90spamschutz2b.webhoster.de ✓ spamschutz4.webhoster.de ✓ spamschutzb.webhoster.de ✓ spamschutz3.webhoster.de ✓
40mx4.webhoster.atA 185.159.120.90 A 185.159.122.190 A 62.27.118.190 A 62.26.185.190spamschutz3.webhoster.de ✓ spamschutz4.webhoster.de ✓ spamschutzb.webhoster.de ✓ spamschutz2b.webhoster.de ✓

Checks

  • ✓ 4 MX records #9
    Found 4 MX records for this domain.
  • ✓ All hosts resolve #10
    All MX records resolve to valid IP addresses.
  • !
    Hosts without IPv6
    The following MX hosts could not be resolved to IPv6 addresses: spamschutz.webhoster.de, mx2.webhoster.net, mx3.webhoster.org, mx4.webhoster.at
    #11
  • ✓ Redundant MX hosts #12
    Found 4 MX records, which provides redundancy for email delivery.
  • ✓ At most 5 MX records #13
    Found 4 MX records, which is within the recommended range (1-5).
  • ✓ No localhost targets #14
    No MX records pointing to localhost found.
  • ✓ No private IP addresses #15
    No MX records resolving to private IP addresses found.
  • ✓ No CNAME targets #22
    No MX records point to a CNAME.
  • ✓ Reverse DNS confirmed #30
    All 13 MX addresss have a PTR record that resolves back to them.

TLS

warn

MTA-STS testing · TLS-RPT · DANE on 0 of 4 MX hosts

Found

MTA-STS record
v=STSv1; id=1694274947082
Policy URL
https://mta-sts.webhoster.de/.well-known/mta-sts.txt
Mode
testing
Allowed MX
spamschutz.webhoster.de, mx1.webhoster.de, mx2.webhoster.net, mx3.webhoster.org, mx4.webhoster.at, *.webhoster.de
Max age
3600 seconds
TLS-RPT record
v=TLSRPTv1; rua=mailto:64fc5c48d0569@tls.dmarcly.com

DANE (TLSA records)

MX hostTLSADNSSEC
spamschutz.webhoster.denone-
mx2.webhoster.netnone-
mx3.webhoster.orgnone-
mx4.webhoster.atnone-

Checks

  • ✓ Record published #32
    MTA-STS record found with id 1694274947082.
  • !
    Policy in testing mode
    With mode: testing, senders only report TLS problems (via TLS-RPT) and still deliver without TLS. Switch to mode: enforce once reports are clean. max_age is only 3600 seconds; use at least a week (604800) so the policy stays cached.
    #33
  • ✓ All MX hosts covered #34
    Every MX host matches an mx: line of the MTA-STS policy.
  • ✓ Reports enabled #35
    TLS reports are sent to: mailto:64fc5c48d0569@tls.dmarcly.com
  • i
    Not used
    No MX host publishes TLSA records. DANE lets senders verify your mail server's certificate through DNSSEC; it requires DNSSEC on the MX host's zone.
    #36

BIMI

warn

https://webhoster.de/webhoster_bimi.svg

Found

Record
v=BIMI1; l=https://webhoster.de/webhoster_bimi.svg;
Found at
default._bimi.webhoster.de
Logo
https://webhoster.de/webhoster_bimi.svg

Checks

  • !
    No certificate (a=)
    The logo is published without a Verified Mark Certificate. Gmail and Apple Mail only show BIMI logos with a VMC or CMC; Yahoo shows it without one.
    #38
  • ✓ DMARC meets BIMI requirements #39
    DMARC is enforced on all mail, as BIMI requires.